Ubuntu 10.10

Discussion topics, Linux related - not requests for help

Moderators: ChriThor, LXF moderators

Postby PCNetSpec » Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:04 am

alan404 wrote:When you go to the "download Ubuntu" page, you should be given two choices...

That's exactly what they *do* have

Download options -
10.10 - Latest version
10.04 LTS - Long term support

and this (right next to the download options)

Our long-term support (LTS) releases are supported for three years on the desktop. Perfect for organisations that need more stability for larger deployments.

Seems pretty clear to me ;)
WARNING: You are logged into reality as 'root'... logging in as 'insane' is the only safe option.
Linux in the UK
The Linux Community Forum
LXF regular
Posts: 631
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Cornwall UK

Postby alan404 » Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:09 am

Yes indeed. For a few months my dreams have come true. Six months ago though it was a very different story. The only option for download was 10.04, which had some problems including not mounting samba shares via Gnome. At this point they should have had 3 downloads, the previous LTS version, 9.04 and the "cutting edge" 10.04, which would become the new LTS now.
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Haslemere, Surrey UK

Ubuntu 10.10

Postby Jimmers » Tue Oct 19, 2010 5:02 pm

Tried twice to install to a kingston data Traveller (8Gig), first time took 3 hours, and took 30 minutes to get to the log in screen, so binned it. Next time it took 1 hour 5 minutes to install, and all seemed well, it even updated, but when I tried to flash it up from cold, it froze at the login screen.
Install from two live CD's from Ubuntu Home Site, think I will wait until Ubuntu User comes out, and see if they de an Extended Version of Maverick like the did with Lucid.
Until then (and maybe beyond) I will stay with Lucid, it has never let me down yet.
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:29 am
Location: Gosport, Hampshire

Postby DocMindwipe » Wed Oct 20, 2010 8:12 am

Been using 42... uhm... 101010 since monday a week ago. Apart from a serious n00b error of not separating the /usr from a 4GB / partition (although, I got 450-something GB for /home :D ) I've got no problems.

My setup is a AM3 motherboard (built ATi videocard (disabled), sound, 10/100/1000MB network) nVidia 220 PCIe x16, 1*500GB EIDE, 1*1.5TB SATA, 24spin SATA DVD +-RW.

I have to say I'm highly impressed with Meerkat. Installed Wine from the repo and my two Redmond-games (UKTS and WoW) works perfectly "out of the box", the nVidia proprietory drivers are stable as anything, no flicker anywhere (AFAICS).

Only thing that annoys me, is that when I go through the software centre and don't click on "install" for a programme for two minutes or so, I have to reenter the password, even though I'm already processing other programmes to be installed.

But yeah... I like the Meerkat. I think it's a wonderful piece of an operating system. It even recognises my iPod Touch pretty much perfectly, and gtkPod now also supports my model as well. (although, I've not dared to try and sync the iPod to either RhytmBox nor gtkPod yet... I like my music and don't wanna lose it :lol)

So... apart from the annoying re-entering the password at the software centre every three minutes or so, it's good.

I'ld give it a 92% score.

It's sure to be a VERY close contender to the Redmond virus, and fresh converts (as long as they've got Wine installed) shouldn't have many problems other than the obvious "I've never done this before" things.
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 2:39 pm

Ubuntu 10.10

Postby Jimmers » Thu Nov 04, 2010 6:03 pm

After several try's to install maverick to no avail, I decided to bite the bullet and try upgrade, after backing up as one does,
I went for it, surprise, surprise it works, but it was only last night, so have not had much chance to give it a good run out.

So so good, but I am not binning my extended version of Lucid, yet.

Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:29 am
Location: Gosport, Hampshire

Postby TheWizardofOdds » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:09 am

I've only had 10.10 for a few days but it seems very little is different to 10.04, maybe the bit of orange colour at the log in screen and desktop? :lol: Normally the difference is palpable but I'm struggling on this one.
LXF regular
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 1:37 pm

Postby budgieboy » Wed Nov 10, 2010 1:21 am

Installed it a few days ago alongside of 10.04 and had problems with Updates to 10.10 that left my 10.04 out of the boot menu and unable to boot it. Sorted it and am now a GRUB2 specialist :wink:

10.10 seems ok but not much different from 10.04 so I'm playing around with it. One thing though...

No working realtime/rt kernel which I need for my Audio video stuff. :o I wont be upgrading 10.04 just yet awhile.
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:57 pm

Postby towy71 » Wed Nov 10, 2010 8:38 am

Well I upgraded to 10.04 which broke several things, going one better to 10.10 fixed 'em :D :D :D
still looking for that door into summer
Posts: 4317
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: wild West Wales

Postby Frustrated » Fri Nov 26, 2010 9:17 pm

I have given up on 10.10. Since the Beta till now it will not properly display on my laptop.

No matter whether I run 10.10 as a LIVE DVD or a full install it ends up the same. I have tried 32 bit and 64 bit versions, downloaded from the Ubuntu site also the LXF DVDs and each time the same result.

From top to bottom the screen clearly displays but on the left and right it only displays approx 1 inch in from either side.

So far nothing from Launchpad or the Ubuntu Forums.

I have not changed my system since I purchased it and all versions from 8.10 until 10.04 worked a treat so why wont 10.10 work? It is beyond me

I can only hope that next time round they get it right
Ubuntu 10.04; Intel Dual Core T2390 1.86Ghz; Intel GMA x 3100 graphics, Atheros AR242x802.11, 1GB RAM.
LXF regular
Posts: 201
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:19 pm


Return to Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests