Nigel wrote:But I do have a choice about whether I respond to posts or not, and I will exercise that choice with open supporters of an organisation that I find distasteful (same as I would if someone had the name www dot microsoft dot com). Others may wish to do likewise.
Perhaps the moderators could gently suggest a change of name to the person in question?
firefox wrote:I'm surprised you didn't start your post with:
"I'm all for freedom of speech, BUT:"
M-Saunders wrote:"Directly linking to a site is different. It just gives the BNP publicity with no comeback."
It's not advertising -- it's a URL. People can visit the site and make up their own minds. And a lot of people who visit the site will be turned off by the BNP's views. But it's best to let people think for themselves rather than banning stuff we dislike...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests