I hate to be a pedant (well, a bit) but what you have described in your entry about homiletics is a 'method' rather than a 'science'*. There is no attempt, for example, at proposing a hypothesis and then formulating experiments to test its limits and/or verity.**
That said, I have often been astonished by the way some preachers manage to weld the mundane aspects of daily life into the Bible and religious thinking (and I'm not just talking about the 'significance of Aslan' in Narnia sermons in association with Disney and WETA Digital), and then the crass way some others manage to shoehorn any piece of tatty popular culture into a religious sermon (see the former example once again).
Magazine formatting is potentially more problematic than an exploration on the existence of a divine intelligence, because you have to balance the generic and house conventions with the need to innovate and be distinctive. However, the real problem when attempting Dactylic Hexameter (or some other meter) in a Linux tutorial is that the distro names never seem to fit.
* I expect you expected this sort of response.
** Confession: I'm a humanities graduate and, thus, know little of the scientific method - I spend all day watching the Olympics. And Teletubbies.