pastychomper wrote:roseway wrote:Don't worry, he's raised it in the Debian forums, and they're an argumentative lot ...
No they're not!
Oh, yes they are....(continue ad infinitum)
Moderators: ChriThor, LXF moderators
pastychomper wrote:roseway wrote:Don't worry, he's raised it in the Debian forums, and they're an argumentative lot ...
No they're not!
towy71 wrote:Ombra what on earth are you on about? Are you chasing shadows?
roseway wrote:Don't worry, he's raised it in the Debian forums, and they're an argumentative lot so I expect it will get a good airing there.
nelz wrote:Intel is one of the major contributors to the kernel, most of it related to hardware support. Even the one item that is vaguely DRM-related is only support for specific Intel business hardware and not affecting user-owners.
Most importantly - even the parts you object too are open source and therefore completely under your control on any computer you administer.
Ombra wrote:nelz wrote:Intel is one of the major contributors to the kernel, most of it related to hardware support. Even the one item that is vaguely DRM-related is only support for specific Intel business hardware and not affecting user-owners.
"Intel is one of the major contributorsto the kernel"
I did not know that...but it does explain much.
Ombra wrote:I can only state again what should be obvious, until I learn how to erase this stuff it most definitely ain't under my control.
Ombra wrote:I will have to begin teaching myself how to reconfigure/rebuild kernel. No telling how long that will take.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests