This is good to see!

Discussion topics, Linux related - not requests for help

Moderators: ChrisThornett, LXF moderators

RE: Re: RE: This is good to see!

Postby jjmac » Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:40 am

nelz
>>
Cookies have nothing to do with it
>>

Good (never have trusted them), i was thinking that login fails on sites that haven't been exempted in my proxy filter (privoxy) may have been due to a cookie not returning, or being confirmed to the sending site. On reading the config again, it does use the word "persistent", hmmm, so the sites just reading it from my end, ok ...

But, does that mean stats are gathered via a bot reading site logs. Would have though they would be locked down.

But as you mention ...

>>
The sites you use the gather the statistics also affect the results. msn.com will get a higher proportion of hits from IE than mozilla.org, this site or Slashdot.
>>

It also depends on how selective they are. Advertising does work though ... lots of people will make a choice based on percieved popularity regardless. It can put to test all that a person thinks/believes sometimes.


jm


jm
http://counter.li.org
#313537

The FVWM wm -=- www.fvwm.org -=-

Somebody stole my air guitar, It happened just the other day,
But it's ok, 'cause i've got a spare ...
jjmac
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1996
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:32 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: RE: This is good to see!

Postby M-Saunders » Thu Nov 10, 2005 10:59 am

nelz wrote:The sites you use the gather the statistics also affect the results. msn.com will get a higher proportion of hits from IE than mozilla.org, this site or Slashdot.


This site is currently around 50% Firefox and 25% IE. I'd imagine it moves even more in favour of Firefox in the evening, when people aren't using Windows boxes at work.

M
User avatar
M-Saunders
LXF regular
 
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 12:14 pm

Previous

Return to Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests