nicephotog wrote:Kwrite pad in the K Desktop is pretty good for its point.
Have you seen this , this is a little different?
http://www.nicephotog-jsp.net/SUcommand ... e-Beta.jsp
But the web sites that you've produced with it are shocking - they're not a good advert for your product.
They are shockingly horrible and w3c validator doesn't like the initial address's code at all
I consider the above to be "non-answers" about HTML editors.
But the editor is not particularly shocking, it has features(the main points) that assist to do fast coding(SUcommanderXer is cross platform also).
The editor does not contain a w3c markup parser note too that "many(maybe the majority quantity of them)" forum sites HTML is not valid, and certainly often not valid XHTML particularly for the dynamically constructed pages.
It is also a common problem of the strategy when using 4.01 DTD Loose coding in JSP sites dynamic, that are adjusted after coding by being checked on different platforms and browsers.
I'll state it again, dynamic sites obtain that difficulty of valid markup immensely easily.
I believe a mild apology or statement retraction is in order about that editor.
So what's this from you LINUXFORMAT.CO.UK is that what Linux and your markup editor does to this forum....
w3c validator check lxf.co.uk
Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!
Result: 32 Errors, 262 warning(s)
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest