Linux Format forums

andychannelle · LXF regular Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:08 pm Posts: 111

There has been some discussion recently about the ethics of porting Linux applications to Windows. Do you think this is a good, or bad thing? And is there a point - for example, porting large portions of KDE to Windows - when things have gone too far?

Andy

linuxgirlie · Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:34 am Post subject: RE: Porting to Windows

I can understand items such as OpenOffice and Gimp being able to be used on Windows, where I work it has been a very important step towards full Linux client computers, as its not the desktop that the users are worried about its the applications.

On the other hand I don't see the point of porting something such as KDE to Windows.
_________________
My knowledge comes with no warranty...........

Server operating system designed for schools:www.linuxschools.com

davecs · Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:51 pm Post subject:

How about porting a cut down version of KDE for windows which gives a taste and wants people coming for more! Which they won't get unless they switch to Linux or a Unix-based system!

On the other hand, Linux is getting easier to install, and if everyone's favourite software runs on both, and people realise that Windows and Linux are just operating systems, then why get the one you have to pay an exhoritant price for?

I must admit that I don't see the point of KDE for Windows, but as it is GPL software if it can be done within the GPL, I can't find a reason to object to it.

fingers99 · LXF regular Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:15 pm Posts: 143

I can't see any problems with it: after all, it's simply a better Desktop than the Windows shell. Once you've used a Open Source application as your desktop, using an Open Source OS can't be far away Wink

jjmac · Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:11 pm Post subject:

How does that impat on the existing "openess" of the code base. Will there be secret kde libraries as a result now. I always thought kde's config files seemed to have a certain MS feel about the, but then, i am a bit of a cynic. Was this an idea of Troll Techs all along. Windows isn't intending to do the right thing and open up by any chance(silly-question.png), or are they going to expect all the compiance to come from the kde end. Do they deserve kde.

jm.
_________________
http://counter.li.org
#313537

The FVWM wm -=- www.fvwm.org -=-

Somebody stole my air guitar, It happened just the other day,
But it's ok, 'cause i've got a spare ...

Andy · Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 7:29 pm Post subject:

That's an interesting one.

I've long held the view that if I can get a user to use OpenOffice.org for Windows then I am half way there to converting them to open source.

However, porting KDE to Windows would be a bit like porting the Mac OS X Aqua interface to Windows - utterly pointless! At the moment the default desktop for a lot of people is still either Win9X/ME/2000 or XP. Why change that un-necessarily? There wouldn't be a lot of incentive for people to switch to a KDE based desktop over a 'classic' Windows desktop.

As for software such as WindowBlinds - I've never really had much to say about window modding software for Windows - I really don't see the point in dressing mutton as lamb. After all, underneath any dressing is MIcrosoft technology which is still unstable and prone to malware.

Any, just my tuppence.

AndyH

andychannelle · LXF regular Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:08 pm Posts: 111

It's quite interesting that there is a possibility that the first real competition for something like Outlook on Windows is going to come from Novell's Evolution (currently being ported by Tor Lillqvist, the man behind GIMP for Windows) rather than another native-Windows developer. I've also seen screenshots of Beagle running on Windows (it's a mono app after all) which potentially covers the same ground as Microsoft's Longhorn search thing and also Spotlight on OS-X.

How do you convert people to OS (if convert is the right word)? I've installed FireFox on every PC of ever person who would let me, but that's probably only about 10 computers. Any success stories?

AndyC

Andy · Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:02 pm Post subject:

And I think that this is where the real wins will be made for open source - moving people across to open source applications on Windows.

At a church not so long ago I was able to move them onto OpenOffice.org to replace Microsoft Office that was available on just one PC. Now they have it installed on several PCs.

A mixture of Mozilla Firefox, Thunderbird and Mozilla Suite are installed at work as standard.

towy71 · Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:10 pm Post subject:

I encourage everyone I know to move to firefox and thunderbird and have done it on about 30 computers so far, hope to win more people over with Open Office and all the goodies on www.theopencd.org
Dick
_________________
still looking for that door into summer

nordle · LXF regular Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 10:56 pm Posts: 1497

IMHO porting kde / _insert_large_desktop_environment_here is totally pointless, a waste of developers time. If a windows user wants to try KDE, boot a live CD.

I agree with Andy in thinking that converting people at an application level is more important, if its right for them of course.
People using OOo, firefox, t-bird, apache, php, mysql, postgresql etc these are all good things introducing people to the idea of another way, and more importantly avoiding vendor lock-in at and application level and keeping open standards, which again helps to avoid vendor lock-in because it increases the demand for open standards itself.

hairymunky · Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 6:50 pm Posts: 59

Well I think it would be pointless to port a Linux based window manager such as KDE or GNOME to the Windows platform. I think it would not intice any new users to the Linux OS, but instead users would probably think "Why have all the hassle of installing a new OS, figuring out how to get hardware working" etc, when they can just run it on their windows box! Apart from the obvious thing Windows already has a Window Manager...

I'm all for cross platform development, but it seems a bit one sided, when programs designed and built with Linux, are also usually available for Windows, but its not often the case with applications designed from a Windows point of view.

What would really make my day, is to walk into WH Smiths, or GAME, or any other high street store, and be able to choose commercial games, that were designed for Linux, without having to rely on middleware (Wine, Cedega etc). Maybe one day, this will happen as more and more people come home to Linux as their favoured Operating System.
Until then I won't hold my breath .... just in case

Andy · Posted: Wed Apr 20, 2005 11:25 pm Post subject:

andychannelle · LXF regular Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 5:08 pm Posts: 111

I think its important that if you buy UT2004, Doom 3 and especially software you intend to use with WINE you ought to let the developers know. For example Macromedia (or Macrodobe - if they've been infected by Mandriva disease) assisted with the CrossOver implementation of DreamweaverMX because it allowed them to test the water for Linux without porting the entire application. In order to go further they need to know their efforts are appreciated (in the financial sense).

The problem is, though, that they might see this as 'doing enough', especially as DWMX runs better under Linux than under WinXP.

linuxgirlie · Posted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 11:14 am Post subject:

Success stories, well both my parents and my partners parents run linux on thier home PCs. My work place is running Linux servers, with Firefox, Gimp and Openoffice on the clients (W2K), in May Half Term we will be rid of Microsoft office completly. Thats about 200 desktops and about 100 laptops. Our future plans are to move to an entire linux desktop. My partners school is around the same place as us but has over 400 computers. I have several students that now run Mandrake at home, and about 20 more that run Firefox. We also, because of the Karoshi project have around 9 schools running Linux servers and firefox/openoffice etc on the clients.

At home, we have 3 computers, 1 server, 1 firewall and 3 laptops which all run linux, I personally haven't had windows on my home computer for over 3 years now....

I think my main problem will be getting the trust of the staff when converting!!
_________________
My knowledge comes with no warranty...........

Server operating system designed for schools:www.linuxschools.com

doctorflange · Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2005 12:42 pm Post subject:

Making KDE etc. available from Windows does detract from the attraction of using linux.

Which would most people rather use?

* Windows, where they can use their normal programs, and great open source software, or
* Linux, where they can use only the open source software?

So if depends on whether you want OSS to benefit people or to take a swipe at M$.
_________________

Signature license here. Background by Michele Valentinuz. Source.