It is always nice to be educated further with computing...

Non-computer-related chit-chat

Moderators: ChrisThornett, LXF moderators

It is always nice to be educated further with computing...

Postby Bazza » Thu Oct 31, 2013 3:35 pm

73...

Bazza, G0LCU...

Team AMIGA...
User avatar
Bazza
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:16 am
Location: Loughborough

Postby Nuke » Thu Oct 31, 2013 4:37 pm

Sorry, but I did not learn much from the link because opinions there seem divided about 50:50 as to whether data increases the weight of the HDD or not.

One guy said he left his laptop downloading stuff, and returned to find just a hole in the floor. But others spout mystic nonsense about magnetic particles changing orientation - can you belive that? ... who knows? :?
Unsolved mysteries of the Universe, No 13 :-
How many remakes of Anna Karenina does the World need?
User avatar
Nuke
LXF regular
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:11 pm
Location: Chepstow, UK

Postby Ram » Thu Oct 31, 2013 7:51 pm

ROFL :roll:

lubuntu LXDE 13.10 running on AMD Phenom II*4; ASUS Crosshair III Formula MB; 4 GB Ram.....
User avatar
Ram
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1683
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:44 pm
Location: Guisborough

Postby guy » Thu Oct 31, 2013 8:25 pm

Nuke wrote:One guy said he left his laptop downloading stuff, and returned to find just a hole in the floor.

Wow, you mean if I upload enough stuff and hold on tight I will fly? Awesome.
"Klinger, do you know how many zoots were killed to make that one suit?" — BJ Hunnicutt
User avatar
guy
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1100
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Worcestershire

Postby towy71 » Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:38 pm

Thankfully all my data is on floppy disk so my computer is cruising at 1200 ft :lol: :lol:
still looking for that door into summer
User avatar
towy71
Moderator
 
Posts: 4267
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: wild West Wales

Postby nelz » Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:07 am

Surely it also depends on the type of data too? Heavy Metal MP3s are bound to weigh more than light entertainment, and big endian data has to be more massive.

Quantum hard drives presumably weigh more as they are in more than one place at the same time...
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Albert Einstein)
User avatar
nelz
Site admin
 
Posts: 8553
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Warrington, UK

Postby Dutch_Master » Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:48 am

nelz wrote:Quantum hard drives presumably weigh more as they are in more than one place at the same time...
No, they weigh less as they're on more place then one and the weight of the data they hold is distributed evenly between those places. Otherwise their data weighs in at one place and is weightless elsewhere. That's impossible!
Dutch_Master
LXF regular
 
Posts: 2460
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:49 am

Postby Ram » Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:33 am

Dutch_Master wrote:
nelz wrote:Quantum hard drives presumably weigh more as they are in more than one place at the same time...
No, they weigh less as they're on more place then one and the weight of the data they hold is distributed evenly between those places. Otherwise their data weighs in at one place and is weightless elsewhere. That's impossible!


That's heavy man, real heavy.

Oh and I have a Quantum HDD in the loft. Very light weight only 50 MB

lubuntu LXDE 13.10 running on AMD Phenom II*4; ASUS Crosshair III Formula MB; 4 GB Ram.....
User avatar
Ram
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1683
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:44 pm
Location: Guisborough

Postby Dutch_Master » Fri Nov 01, 2013 3:20 am

Come to think of it, more storage makes it lighter! Remember the days of 128kB RAM, harddrives of 512MB and 10" VGA CRT monitors for your quite unwieldy 486 box? Compare to the latest tablets with 128GB of storage and 512MB of RAM, the tablet is a featherweight! So, more data makes a device lighter :shock:
Dutch_Master
LXF regular
 
Posts: 2460
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:49 am

Postby lok1950 » Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:18 am

Ducth Master wrote: So, more data makes a device lighter :shock:


Then just think of all the data on the net no wonder is called the Clould.

Enjoy the Choice :)
User avatar
lok1950
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1037
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:31 am
Location: Ottawa

Postby guy » Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:51 am

Dutch_Master wrote:
nelz wrote:Quantum hard drives presumably weigh more as they are in more than one place at the same time...
No, they weigh less as they're on more place then one and the weight of the data they hold is distributed evenly between those places. Otherwise their data weighs in at one place and is weightless elsewhere. That's impossible!

Not that either. A quantum drive exists in a superposition of different possible weights, and it does not have a real weight until you collapse it (I have used a lump hammer for this). Even then its weight will be arbitrary within a range of probable values.

And if you entangle two quantum drives together (easy once the cables are attached), then writing data to one also writes the data to the other, a great software-free backup regime.

The only downside is you have to buy two HDs, then smash one flat before you can read your data back from the other.
"Klinger, do you know how many zoots were killed to make that one suit?" — BJ Hunnicutt
User avatar
guy
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1100
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Worcestershire

Postby nelz » Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:55 am

You've all missed the point that Quantum drives of any significant size don't exist at all. The company stopped making hard drives in 2001 :P
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." (Albert Einstein)
User avatar
nelz
Site admin
 
Posts: 8553
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 11:52 am
Location: Warrington, UK

Postby Bazza » Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:11 pm

LOL! Keep the comments comin' guys...

IMO, a hard drive's weight is continually dynamic due to constant thrashing of the I-O, (iron-Oxide)...

The Earth's magnetic field plays its part too; like poles repel and opposing poles attract - basic physics...
73...

Bazza, G0LCU...

Team AMIGA...
User avatar
Bazza
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:16 am
Location: Loughborough

Postby guy » Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:43 pm

nelz wrote:You've all missed the point that Quantum drives of any significant size don't exist at all. The company stopped making hard drives in 2001 :P

You mean all their drives have had definite weights since it collapsed? :D
"Klinger, do you know how many zoots were killed to make that one suit?" — BJ Hunnicutt
User avatar
guy
LXF regular
 
Posts: 1100
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 12:07 pm
Location: Worcestershire


Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests